NEWS

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MATRIX ANALYSIS: Films 'The Emperor's Club', 'Stand and Deliver'

THE EMPEROR’S CLUB CHARACTER/S ETHICAL DILEMMA HUMAN ACT ETHICAL PRINCIPLE Martin Blythe (Student) At the dormitory. While studying with friends, Bell showed over to them (including Martin) his (Bell’s) nude magazines. Will Martin reject an act of offense to their school, or will he go with them for peer pressure? Martin rationally detaches himself from peer pressure and abides with the school policy as contradistinctive with his friends ’  acts. Authoritarian ethics . Martin’s decision is anchored on authority and force as determinants of the morality of an act. Mr. Hundert (Teacher) Qualified quizzers. Mr. Hundert checks the essays of students and decides who to qualify for the Julius Caesar quiz bowl. Will he be honest and stick to the original qualified students for the quiz bowl, or alter the result since he believes by giving chance to Bell as one of the quizzers? Mr. Hundert chooses to give Bell a chance to win the Julius Caesar crown s...
Read more

SPOUSES DE MESA vs. SPOUSES ACERO

SPOUSES DE MESA vs. SPOUSES ACERO G.R. No. 185064. January 16, 2012 FACTS: Sometime in September 1988, Araceli obtained a loan from Claudio D. Acero, Jr. in the amount of P100,000.00, which was secured by a mortgage over the property, where a house was constructed thereon in 1987, they jointly purchased in 1984 while they were still merely cohabiting before their marriage. As payment, Araceli issued a check payable to Claudio. But it was dishonored as the account from which it was drawn had already been closed. The petitioners failed to heed Claudio’s subsequent demand for payment. Thus, on April 26, 1990, Claudio filed a complaint for violation of Batas Pambansa Blg. 22 (B.P. 22) against the petitioners. In 1992, the RTC rendered a Decision acquitting the petitioners but ordering them to pay Claudio the amount of P100,000.00 with legal interest from date of demand until fully paid. In 1993, a writ of execution was issued and Sheriff Samonte levied upon the subject property. On M...
Read more

Tribiana vs Tribiana

EDWIN N. TRIBIANA vs. LOURDES M. TRIBIANA G.R. No. 137359. September 13, 2004 FACTS: Edwin and Lourdes are husband and wife who have lived together since 1996 but formalized their union only on 28 October 1997. On 30 April 1998, Lourdes filed a petition for habeas corpus before the RTC claiming that Edwin left their conjugal home with their daughter, (Khriza). Edwin has since deprived Lourdes of lawful custody of Khriza who was then only one (1) year and four (4) months of age. Later, it turned out that Khriza was being held by Edwin’s mother, Rosalina Tribiana.  Edwin moved to dismiss Lourdes’ petition on the ground that the petition failed to allege that earnest efforts at a compromise were made before its filing as required by Article 151 of the Family Code. ISSUE: Whether or not failure to allege compromise proceedings in a petition is a ground for dismissal. HELD: NO. Lourdes has complied with the condition precedent under Article 151 of the Family Code. She a...
Read more